Search for: "Canada v. Client Services Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 323
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
On 11 June 2015, the Court of Appeal for British Columbia handed down judgment in the controversial case of Equuestek Solutions v Google Inc (2015 BCCA 265) dismissing Google’s appeal against a worldwide injunction ordering it to remove websites from search results (2014 BCSC 1063). [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 7:39 am by Simon Chester
Neil, and re-affirmed in Strother v. 3464920 Canada Inc. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
As to trademark agents see Visa International Service Assn. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 9:00 pm by clc-admin
It may be considered, however, in the resolution of ambiguity in the contractual language used: Shewchuk v Blackmount Capital Inc., 2016 ONCA 9123 at 41….A cautionary approach is required where evidence of such subsequent conduct is used for the purpose of divining intention. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
Two significant decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada shortly after the introduction of the Charter—Andrews v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
Dodek, Solicitor-Client Privilege (Markham: LexisNexis Canada Inc., 2014) at 21-23); (3) Although lawyer whistleblowing is justified under the narrow exceptions provided for in the Rules of Professional Conduct, insofar as the proposed policy provides financial awards in exchange for disclosure, the presence of a financial incentive risks creating a conflict with lawyers’ duty of commitment to a client’s cause, recently recognized by the Supreme Court… [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 1:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Supreme Court of Canada released a decision this week in Hryniak v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Heller The Supreme Court of Canada recently released its much anticipated decision in Uber Technologies Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Records systems are becoming a network of applications existing in-house, in mobile devices, and in centralized, shared utility services such as “the cloud. [read post]
12 May 2014, 8:01 am
Labour Law BlogMay 13 — British Columbia — Canada v. [read post]
11 Mar 2006, 3:12 pm
Metropolitan Stores (MTS) Ltd., [1987] 1 S.C.R. 110, and applied in RJR MacDonald Inc. v. [read post]